How to use it· 4 steps
- Choose units and enter your sex, age, height and weight.
- Add your body-fat percentage if you have a reliable figure — it unlocks Katch–McArdle, the third result.
- Compare the three results. The one marked in use feeds the maintenance figure; switch it with the formula menu.
- Pick an activity level to see what your BMR means in daily calories, or open the calorie calculator to plan a goal.
Step by step
How to use the bmr calculator
- 1Choose units and enter your sex, age, height and weight.
- 2Add your body-fat percentage if you have a reliable figure — it unlocks Katch–McArdle, the third result.
- 3Compare the three results. The one marked in use feeds the maintenance figure; switch it with the formula menu.
- 4Pick an activity level to see what your BMR means in daily calories, or open the calorie calculator to plan a goal.
What BMR measures — and what it does not
BMR is measured in a laboratory under strict conditions: lying down, awake, after a night's sleep and a 12-hour fast, in a room that is neither warm nor cool. What remains is the cost of staying alive — the heart beating, the lungs breathing, the brain running, the kidneys filtering, and every cell maintaining itself. The liver, brain, heart and kidneys weigh only a few kilograms between them but account for a disproportionately large share of it.
Resting metabolic rate (RMR), the term you will also see, is measured under looser conditions and usually comes out slightly higher. Mifflin–St Jeor was in fact fitted to resting measurements. In everyday use the two terms are interchangeable, and the difference between them is small next to the error of any equation.
BMR is not what you burn in a day. Sitting upright, moving around and digesting food all cost extra — even the lowest activity factor, for a sedentary day, adds 20% — which is why the calorie calculator multiplies BMR by an activity factor before suggesting what to eat.
The three equations, and where each comes from
Mifflin–St Jeor (1990): 10 × weight in kg + 6.25 × height in cm − 5 × age, plus 5 for men or minus 161 for women. It was fitted on 498 healthy adults aged 19 to 78 — normal-weight and obese — whose energy use was measured by indirect calorimetry, and a 2005 systematic review for the American Dietetic Association, by Frankenfield and colleagues, found it the most reliable of the common equations for healthy adults.
Harris–Benedict is the original, first published in 1918. Roza and Shizgal re-derived its coefficients in 1984, and that revised version is the one used here: for men, 88.362 + 13.397 × weight + 4.799 × height − 5.677 × age; for women, 447.593 + 9.247 × weight + 3.098 × height − 4.330 × age. It usually gives a figure a few per cent above Mifflin–St Jeor.
Katch–McArdle: 370 + 21.6 × lean body mass in kg. It has no age or sex term at all, because it starts from the thing those terms stand in for. Muscle and organs burn energy at rest; fat tissue burns comparatively little. If you know your body fat, this formula can correct for a build that weight alone misreads.
Which result to trust
For most people, Mifflin–St Jeor. It is the default here and the equation dietitians most often reach for.
Katch–McArdle earns its place when your body composition is unusual — a muscular lifter whose weight overstates their fat, or someone whose weight is mostly fat and overstates their lean mass. But it is only as good as the body-fat figure you give it. A bathroom-scale reading can be several points out, and a 5-point error in body fat moves Katch–McArdle by about 85 kcal for an 80 kg person.
When the three disagree, the spread is information. For a 30-year-old man of 180 cm and 80 kg, Mifflin–St Jeor gives 1,780 kcal, Harris–Benedict 1,854 kcal and Katch–McArdle, at 20% body fat, 1,752 kcal — about a 6% spread. None of them is wrong. They are three averages fitted to different groups of people, decades apart, and you are one individual.
Why BMR changes — and what changes it less than you might think
Age: the two weight-based equations lower BMR as you get older — by 5 kcal a year in Mifflin–St Jeor — largely because lean mass tends to fall; Katch–McArdle has no age term and picks that change up through your body-fat figure instead. Strength training slows the decline, which makes it the most direct lever you have over your own BMR.
Weight: a smaller body burns less, so BMR falls as you lose weight — about 10 kcal a day for every kilogram lost, going by Mifflin–St Jeor's weight term alone. Some studies find an extra drop beyond what the smaller size explains, an effect called adaptive thermogenesis. It is real, but usually modest.
What moves it less than the marketing suggests: detox teas, 'fat-burning' supplements and so-called metabolism-boosting foods. None has been shown to raise BMR meaningfully or for long. The reliable levers are muscle and movement.
These figures are estimates for healthy adults, not medical advice. Illness, fever, pregnancy and thyroid conditions shift BMR in ways no equation can see, and weight that changes without an obvious reason is a question for a doctor rather than a calculator.
Answers
Frequently asked questions
What is a normal BMR?
There is no single normal, because BMR scales with size, sex and age. For average-sized adults, Mifflin–St Jeor typically gives about 1,200–1,500 kcal for women and 1,500–1,900 kcal for men. The maintenance figure — BMR times your activity factor — is the one that tells you what you actually burn.
Is BMR the number of calories I burn in a day?
No, only the at-rest part. Your daily burn (TDEE) is BMR multiplied by an activity factor: 1.2 even for a sedentary person, rising to 1.9 for hard daily training.
Should I eat less than my BMR to lose weight?
Usually not. A target below BMR is an aggressive deficit — harder to sustain and more likely to cost muscle. The calorie calculator flags targets below your BMR and below the commonly cited floors of 1,200 kcal for women and 1,500 kcal for men.
Why do the three formulas give different numbers?
They were fitted to different groups of people, with different methods, decades apart. The spread between them is an honest measure of how uncertain any single equation is for an individual — typically a few per cent, sometimes more.
How do I find my body-fat percentage for Katch–McArdle?
A DEXA scan is the most reliable option most people can get. A careful tape-measure estimate with the US Navy method is a free alternative: use the body fat calculator on this site, then bring the figure back here.
Is anything I enter uploaded?
No. All three equations run in your browser, and nothing you enter is stored or sent anywhere.